Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2806

Re: Substance Volume Tracking - Basic questions for better understanding

$
0
0

Hello

 

in context of paragraph:

 

" Basic master data model": this is the normal SVT scenario used. Only one slight "difference". Sometimes companies handle registration topics not on PURE_SUB but on LIST_SUB level. But SAP standard can handle this difference

 

In context  of paragraph: "Usage of SAP_EHS_1023_057"


SAP_EHS_1026_001 is not used often (I would assume): Use is only needed if you would like to get "earlier" warnings etc. in comparison to the "general limits"

SO: . Is there a prioritization set if target quanities are maintained at both places?


Yes there is a priorizationlogic used. If spec does have "lower" limit in SAP_EHS_1026_001 in comparison  to SAP_EHS_1023_057 then SVT reacts "earlier" based on data.


IN context of paragraph."Beyond REACH As mentioned"


You need a different regulation and the complete SVT set up. Then you can support the business case. " controlled substance monitoring and tracking"


IN context of paragraph :#VT Monitor and visibility This is related to the previous section How far the visibility is possible with SVT monitoring and tracking. Is it at Site/Plant level or Country level consolidation/aggregation is also possible?


Not sure about your question. Any trackingis always done on plant/company level (high level picture). And plants belongs to countries.


Your termn "consolidaiotn/aggregation" might be "misleading". If you use CBRC20 you can use the functionality there to "aggregate" per "plant" without a problem. BUt there is no standard functionality implemented to support "reacts" on plant level. This is done on company level.


BUt may be I misinterpret your topic


C.B.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2806

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>